The browser or device you are using is out of date. It has known security flaws and a limited feature set. You will not see all the features of some websites. Please update your browser. A list of the most popular browsers can be found below.
"The weird part of being an abortion provider is that often we're the first people to inform women about the law. Sometimes they get mad at us. They ask, 'Who decided this?' or 'What am I going to do? I can't afford another child'," Hagstrom Miller said.
Indeed, abortion providers warned that up to a third of abortion clinics in Texas would close if the admitting privileges law went into effect. They argued in a bench trial in the Western District Court last week that the bureaucratic hurdles to gain admitting privileges were so complex and lengthy that up to 13 clinics would stop providing abortions and 22,000 Texans would lose access to safe, affordable care.
Abortion clinics in Austin, Forth Worth, McAllen, San Antonio, Killeen, Harlingen and Lubbock have confirmed today that they are not providing abortions.
But while some abortion providers may gain admitting privileges in the future, many clinics may not be able to weather the uncertainty. Hasgtrom Miller said that up to 50 percent of her 52-strong staff would have to be furloughed, and eight physicians would be out of work.
Although Whole Woman's Health is a lead plaintiff in the suit against the law, Hagstrom Miller noted said that she did not have the budget to stay open for weeks without patients. "If we don't get admitting privileges, we'll have to start the business of closing clinics," she said. She said there wouldn't be visual images of shuttered clinics across the state because providers are still obligated to provide follow-up appointments to previous patients, while some also provide family planning care. "When you close down a facility and when you liquidate a business, it takes time," she said.
Larger providers like Planned Parenthood may be better set to weather the uncertainty. The Planned Parenthood surgical clinic in Austin also provides women’s health services such as contraception and cancer screenings. The family planning portion of their business is run by a separate legal entity in accordance with previous legal requirements in Texas. They will continue to remain open and to provide the full spectrum of women’s health services.
In the airy, high-ceilinged building that hosts the surgical center, the family planning center and the administrative offices, Sarah Wheat gestured to 150 wall tiles, each marking a major donor to Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas. She said that they will do whatever they can to continue to provide reproductive health services. They will rely heavily on the local community to enable them to do this. "We want women to know that there is an entire community that supports their health," Wheat said, adding that they were considering using donor money to provide transport aid and clinic expansions in other cities, and to explore further legal options.
Robbie Ausley, a board member of Planned Parenthood of Greater Texas and the leading force behind the construction of the south Austin clinic that bears her name, said they would overcome the court’s decision and its impact. "Perseverance!" she said, "We will not lay down. We will never go away when we have this much compassion for women."