The Montana attorney general's office called on the state Supreme Court to throw out a 30-day sentence given to a teacher who raped a 14-year-old girl, saying the punishment was illegally lenient.
The state formally filed its arguments Friday in the appeal of the highly criticized sentence for Stacey Rambold, 54, who was released from Montana State Prison in September.
District Judge G. Todd Baugh sparked outrage when he commented in August that victim Cherice Moralez was "older than her chronological age," and that she had some "control" over the relationship with her teacher.
Moralez killed herself in 2010 before the case went to trial. The judge later apologized and said his comments were based on videotaped interviews with Moralez that have not been publicly released.
Baugh said he had not been aware of the state's two-year minimum sentencing requirement, according to local news channel KTVQ station in Billings, Mont.
"It didn't come out right, and I owe the whole county, especially women, an apology," he told reporters in reference to his comments about the victim's age.
The state argues the child was not legally capable of consent and that the judge's sentence was illegal.
The brief argues the minimum legal sentence would have been two years in prison. But prosecutors said they still believe a sentence of 20 years in prison, with 10 years suspended, would be appropriate.
Baugh relied on a different section of the same law cited by prosecutors when he gave the defendant 15 years with all but 31 days suspended and a one-day credit for time served.
Rambold's attorney, Jay Lansing, has not responded to repeated requests for comment on the case.
The attorney general's office said Rambold's sentence should be vacated and remanded for sentencing.
Prosecutors said that "there is no legitimate hypothetical that allows blame to be placed on a 14-year-old student who has been victimized by her (then-)47-year-old teacher."
Recently, several advocacy groups asked the Supreme Court (PDF) to be allowed to file supporting arguments in the appeal. They argued they can provide expertise in legal and social advocacy for women's rights.
The judge's statements reflected "stereotypical, prejudicial, and generally false beliefs regarding sexual assault," the groups say.
Court documents show there were complaints about Rambold's conduct with female students as early as 2004. Three years before his relationship with Moralez, prosecutors say, "he was warned to stay away from young girls in his class."
Rambold has been registered as a level 1 sex offender, meaning he's considered a low risk to reoffend. He will remain on probation through 2028 unless the original sentence is overruled.
Al Jazeera and The Associated Press
Error
Sorry, your comment was not saved due to a technical problem. Please try again later or using a different browser.