The browser or device you are using is out of date. It has known security flaws and a limited feature set. You will not see all the features of some websites. Please update your browser. A list of the most popular browsers can be found below.
The president's speech Tuesday night covered topics from the minimum wage and technology investment to Hezbollah, Iran and the diplomatic legacies of Presidents John F. Kennedy and Ronald Reagan, but omitted any reference to a crisis that has raised health and safety concerns for hundreds of thousands of Americans in West Virginia.
Despite an all-clear from the local water supplier, some residents around the Charleston area remain skeptical of drinking water contaminated by 10,000 gallons of coal-cleaning chemicals stored near the Elk River, a major source of drinking water in a state where coal mining pollution has already poisoned wells for many who live near mines.
Even as Obama touted the promise of hydraulic fracturing and natural gas — which have raised massive environmental concerns — as ways of battling the country’s energy and economic woes, he made no mention of the Jan. 9 West Virginia environmental disaster, in which a Freedom Industries tank leaked 4-methylcyclohexylmethanol, along with another substance called PPH, contaminating the water of about 300,000 West Virginians in nine counties in and around Charleston, the state capital.
Members of the oil and gas industry responded positively to Obama's inclusion of natural gas drilling in his speech.
“If President Obama has decided to take unilateral action, he can fight income inequality by seizing this once-in-a-lifetime energy moment by allowing more oil and natural gas jobs that pay seven times the minimum wage," said Jack Gerard, president and CEO of the American Petroleum Institute, in a news release issued after the speech. He also called for quick approval of the Keystone XL pipeline.
"The American energy renaissance gives us a unique opportunity to revitalize our economy and become a global energy superpower while helping Americans get back to work," he said.
West Virginia, with large natural gas deposits, plays a big role in the rebirth of American fossil fuel output.
I don’t feel snubbed, but maybe it’s because I’m Appalachian. I’m used to it.
To some West Virginians, Obama’s failure to mention their continuing plight is a letdown but doesn’t come as a shock for people who say they’re accustomed to seeing their part of the country ignored.
“As a native West Virginian and Appalachian scholar, I am disappointed but unsurprised that President Obama did not mention the West Virginia water crisis in his State of the Union,” said Krista Bryson, from Winfield, W.Va. Bryson is a Ph.D. candidate in English at Ohio State University, studying the culture of the region where she grew up.
Winfield is northwest of Charleston in Putnam County, one of nine affected by the crisis.
“Unfortunately, the federal government’s dismissal or willful ignorance of serious problems in West Virginia and Appalachia has been the norm for decades. Appalachian problems are not prioritized in the scope of national politics,” said Bryson, who started a blog to keep track of the water crisis.
She also blames what she calls more than 100 years of discrimination against people from the impoverished mountain region, long a source of raw resources including coal and timber.
“And because this discrimination has gone completely unchecked in the public sphere, it persists,” said Bryson, “blinding people to the many problems Appalachians face every day, problems that are not of our own choosing but part of an inescapable system of inequality that the rest of the nation is blithely inattentive to.”
Dustin White, an environmental activist, echoed Bryson’s view, saying he was disappointed in Obama's failure to mention the issue.
“It seems the plight of West Virginians and others throughout the Appalachian region is still not even a blip on his radar,” White said.
Most of West Virginia lies inside the Marcellus Shale, a massive area of gas deposits targeted for hydraulic fracturing, also known as fracking — which critics say is often responsible for water contamination. White worries that the location of the deposit will deepen his state’s economic dependence on fossil fuels and threaten water resources.
Obama, in his speech, hailed $100 billion in natural gas investment as a bridge between carbon and solar energy, saying, “If extracted safely, it’s the bridge fuel that can power our economy with less of the carbon pollution that causes climate change ...
“I’ll cut red tape to help states get those factories built, and this Congress can help by putting people to work building fueling stations that shift more cars and trucks from foreign oil to American natural gas ...
“Taken together, our energy policy is creating jobs and leading to a cleaner, safer planet.”
Vivian Stockman, spokeswoman for the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, praised some parts of Obama’s speech but sharply criticized his views on fracking.
“I’m glad the president mentioned solar energy and emphatically stated that climate change is already causing dire problems and we must answer to our children for our actions now,” Stockman told Al Jazeera.
“I agree we should cut subsidies to fossil fuel industries, but it’s wrong to claim natural gas (fracking) is a bridge fuel. Fracking, like mountaintop-removal coal mining, is poisoning our water.”
Maria Gunnoe, also with the Ohio Valley Environmental Coalition, said Obama’s support for fracking sounded to her like an “eviction notice,” but the lack of mention of the state’s water woes was worst.
“I just feel like he’s so disassociated from what’s happening in West Virginia,” said Gunnoe, who is from Bob White, a small town in Boone County that was under a water-use ban.
“He said nothing about 300,000 people without good water."
Kunz studies the effect of corporations on public finances. She said that many elected leaders in West Virginia are “blatantly beholden to the fossil fuels industry,” with a few exceptions, adding that the cozy relationship has done harm to residents’ water resources.
To Kunz, "natural gas is picking up where the coal companies left off, in terms of potential pollution, but without all the local jobs created by coal."
Despite her misgivings about fossil fuels, Obama's not mentioning the water crisis did not disappoint her.
“I thought it was a great speech. The president was relaxed and witty,” said Kunz, who said she appreciated how Obama touched on a variety of issues like “raising the minimum wage, vowing to promote immigration reform, bring our troops home and close Guantanamo.”
“He never mentioned the water disaster in Charleston — or Hurricane Sandy, for that matter. They were not appropriate topics for this speech; the State of the Union traditionally is broader — national — in scope.”
‘Plenty to vent’
But for Charleston, a fear of what's coming through faucets remains.
Although a drinking water ban has been lifted by the water supplier, West Virginia American Water, many residents are still afraid of drinking it, complaining of the lingering licorice smell that makes them wary of using what comes out of the tap.
Harper lives with her husband in Elkview, near Charleston, and attends nursing school. Just as Obama didn’t mention her region’s plight, life got in the way of her being able to catch the president’s speech.
“I will be missing it,” she told Al Jazeera on Tuesday night.
“I have two classes on Tuesday evenings. I hate that I’m missing it.”
Weeks ago, when the water ban was first lifted, Harper had been excited to start using the tap again. That enthusiasm faded as the MCHM scent stuck around.
As for enduring the continuing ordeal of trying to raise her child without access to water she considers clean, Harper says she's upset.
US court rules to protect historic labor battle site from coal development
What should California do about its drought?
US may finally strike in Syria, but no bunker required for Assad
Obama approves spy flights over Syria
Find Al Jazeera America on your TV
Get email updates from Al Jazeera America
Sign up for our weekly newsletter
West Virginians don't blame coal industry for chemical leak
West Virginians say they don’t fault coal industry for water crisis
Many West Virginians don’t blame the coal industry for the spill of a coal-processing chemical that has tainted the water of 300,000 people around Charleston
West Virginia water ban lifted even as residents getting sick
Residents in the areas affected by chemical contamination can drink the water, but many say they are becoming ill
West Virginia doctor on tap water: ‘I don’t think it’s safe’
More West Virginians are back to drinking tap water after last week's chemical spill, but one doctor advises to hold off
Lack of trickle-down in West Virginia leaves poorest high and dry
Chemical spill crisis and lack of potable water highlight state's wealth divide
Mountain State misery: Scenes from West Virginia's water crisis
After a chemical spill shut down the drinking water supply for 300,000 West Virginians, here's how some are coping