Carter's testimony described a changing approach to the fight against ISIL, focusing largely on Raqqa, the group's declared capital in Syria, and Ramadi, the capital of Anbar province in western Iraq. It reflected an acknowledgment of little recent progress in defeating the armed group.
Carter said the U.S. would intensify the air campaign against ISIL with additional U.S. and coalition aircraft and heavier airstrikes. His testimony came as Russia is conducting its own airstrikes in Syria, saying it aims to help the Syrian government defeat ISIL and other armed groups.
While both the U.S. and Russia oppose ISIL, Russia is supporting Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, whom the U.S. wants out of power. Some Republican lawmakers complained that the Obama administration isn't doing enough against Assad.
Carter said the U.S.-led effort will include more strikes against ISIL's “high-value targets as our intelligence improves, and also its oil enterprise, which is a critical pillar of IS's financial infrastructure.” IS, which stands for Islamic State, is another common acronym for the armed group.
Carter said to keep up the pressure on Raqqa, the U.S. will support moderate Syrian forces, who have made territorial gains against ISIL near that city. “Some of them are within 30 miles of Raqqa today,” he said.
He said the U.S. also hopes to better equip Arab forces battling ISIL and to further bolster Jordan, a neighbor of Iraq and Syria, which is flying missions as part of the anti-ISIL coalition.
Carter said he was disappointed that the U.S. effort to form new moderate Syrian rebel forces to fight ISIL had failed. He said the new approach is to work with vetted leaders of groups that are already fighting the armed group and also give them equipment and training and help support them with U.S. air power.
“If done in concert as we intend, all these actions on the ground and from the air should help shrink ISIL territory into a smaller and smaller area and create new opportunities for targeting ISIL — ultimately denying this evil movement any safe haven in its supposed heartland,” Carter said.
The new strategy also includes helping the Iraqi government's effort to assemble Iraqi forces, including Sunni fighters, to fight ISIL fighters in Anbar province. Carter said that as the U.S. sees more progress in assembling motivated Iraqi forces, it will be willing to continue providing more equipment and fire support to help them succeed.
“However, the Iraqi government and security forces will have to take certain steps militarily to make sure progress sticks,” he said.
Carter's outline of the new U.S. approach came under attack by Republicans on the committee.
Republican Sen. Lindsey Graham of South Carolina pressed both Carter and Marine Gen. Joseph Dunford Jr., chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, on whether the U.S. has a military strategy to take out the Syrian president. Graham noted that Russian, Iranian and the Hezbollah armed group all are supporting Assad. Carter and Dunford both repeatedly said that the U.S. was supporting moderate forces in Syria in the fight against ISIL, but not those fighting against Assad.
Carter said the U.S. approach to removing Assad has been mostly a political effort.
Dunford said, “I think the balance of forces right now are in Assad's advantage.”
Graham seized on their replies, saying Assad is “secure as the day is long.”
“If I'm Assad this is a good day for me because the American government has just said, without saying it, that they are not going to fight to replace me,” Graham said.
“You have turned Syria over to Russia and Iran. … This is a sad day for America and the region will pay hell for this,” he said. “The Arabs are not going to accept this. The people of Syria are not going to accept this.”
The Associated Press
Sorry, your comment was not saved due to a technical problem. Please try again later or using a different browser.