Reider said the tribe made the decision Friday to destroy its marijuana and burned it Saturday. He said tribal officials wanted to avoid a raid that might have damaged equipment or the facility and wanted to demonstrate good faith as it continues conversations with officials in hopes of resuming the project.
"We just felt it would be best to go in with a clean slate to look for answers on how to proceed so that all sides are comfortable with it," he said.
He said more talks are scheduled this week with Seiler and with state Attorney General Marty Jackley. Jackley said over the weekend that the decision to destroy the crop was "in the best interest of both tribal and nontribal members."
The legalization of marijuana on Santee Sioux land came in June, months after the Justice Department outlined a new policy that allows Indian tribes to grow and sell marijuana under the same conditions as some states.
Many tribes have been hesitant to jump into the pot business, and not everyone in Flandreau, about 45 miles north of Sioux Falls, supports the project.
The tribe has said the project could generate up to $2 million a month in profit. But some state officials have questioned the plan, including Jackley, who has said any changes in tribal laws wouldn't affect nontribal land or anyone who wasn't a tribal member.
Tim Purdon, a Minneapolis attorney who served as the U.S. attorney for North Dakota from 2010 to 2015, said federal officials could raid marijuana operations at any time because cannabis remains illegal under federal law. The new Justice Department policy doesn't change that, he said.
"The whole memorandum is a department policy," he said. "It does not legalize recreational cannabis. It really sets forth the [enforcement] priorities that will be looked at."
He said no operator should expect a stamp of approval from the federal government.
"The Department of Justice is never going to give a tribe or a merchant in a state where it's legalized a letter saying you have permission to do this," Purdon said. "Cannabis remains illegal under federal law. And looking for some sort of advisory opinion from the department saying that what you're doing is OK is never going to happen."
The Associated Press