If the bones are about as old as the Homo group, that would mean that H. naledi is “a snapshot of … the evolutionary experimentation that was going on right around the origin” of Homo, he said. If they are significantly younger, then H. naledi retained the primitive body characteristics much longer than any other known creature or it re-evolved them, he said.
Eric Delson of Lehman College in New York, who also wasn’t involved with the work, said his guess is that H. naledi fits in a known group of early Homo creatures from about 2 million years ago.
Besides the age of the bones, another mystery is how they got into the difficult-to-reach area of the cave. The researchers said they suspect H. naledi may have repeatedly deposited their dead in the room or that it was a death trap for individuals who found their way in.
“This stuff is like a Sherlock Holmes mystery,” declared Bernard Wood of George Washington University in Washington, D.C., who was not involved in the study. Visitors to the cave must have created artificial light, such as a torch, he said. The people who did cave drawings in Europe had such technology, but nobody has suspected that creatures with such a small brain as H. naledi would have the mental ability for that, he said.
Potts said a deliberate disposal of dead bodies is a feasible explanation for the collection of bones, but he added it’s not clear who did the disposing. Maybe it was some human relative other than H. naledi, he said.
Not everybody agreed that the discovery revealed a new species. Tim White of the University of California at Berkeley called that claim questionable. “From what is presented here, [the fossils] belong to a primitive Homo erectus, a species named in the 1800s,” he said in an email.
The Associated Press
Error
Sorry, your comment was not saved due to a technical problem. Please try again later or using a different browser.