ITHACA, N.Y. — From the Patent Office: I have before me here on the office corkboard yellow, dog-eared clippings from two venerable publications, Wired and the Daily Mail, pinned there months ago by an underling. One is about robots. The other is about supersonic travel. I must remember to give this underling a handsome tip. It is midgets like him on whose shoulders a giant must stand if he is to see anything around here.
"Load yourself into an enormous shotgun shell and shoot yourself 400 miles across the state at 800 mph," the piece in Wired began.
Now why would we want to do that, I thought.
Elon Musk, CEO of SpaceX and Tesla Motors, months ago released a white paper for some boondoggle he called "Hyperloop," basically a pair of elevated maglev tubes firing friction-free passenger-pods up and down California’s Interstate 5. He called it a "cross between a Concorde and a railgun and an air hockey table," but actually, no, it isn't. It's a cross between a fiber optic cable and the vacuum tube thing my mom used to put checks into in the drive-thru of the now-defunct American Commercial and Savings Bank in my hometown of Ventura, Calif.
Which is to say that Musk, founder of X.com and co-founder of Paypal, wittingly or not, wants to model the future movement of people on the present movement of money and information.
No wonder the world shrugged. It's an old and pointless fantasy. At least as old as "teleportation," which some bright-eyed halfwit dreamt up five years after the first transatlantic phone call. Probably older. Poets have long believed that if their winged words soared over the Aonian Mount they could summon the distant and the dead. Fat chance! They're happy where they are.
Because here's the thing: information travels so that people don’t have to. We visionaries are especially apt to forget this. "Watson — come here — I want to see you," said Alexander Graham Bell into his first phone, beautifully missing the whole point of the thing. Watson I'll bet was all over it. If he was anything like my underlings, he hung up the receiver, rolled sluggish eyes in fat sockets and groaned.
Thus I mused, reader. Then I turned to the other clipping.
"Meet the amazing robots that can move like animals, communicate with humans and even dance and draw," barked the Mail, and I was under the big top tent-flaps in a heartbeat. We at the office have long felt that much of human life simply awaited full automation, and surely such wearisome activities as dancing, drawing and moving like animals are as good a place as any to start.
The piece swept me into the London Science Museum's "International Living Machines"conference. Frankly, I doubt a motlier gang of mystifiers and mountebanks has ever set up stalls in South Kensington. Some hustler was touting his "Shrewbot," a hideous rolling, hunting thing with artificial whiskers. A pack of Italians had some sort of four-footed dancing droid on parade. One leering "Robo-thespian" mimicked onlookers, while another sketched them.
The germ of genius in all this nonsense flashed through me like a contagion. "We don't need robots to work for us," I said to myself.
We need them to play for us.
Error
Sorry, your comment was not saved due to a technical problem. Please try again later or using a different browser.